Originally posted by John -- '02 HAWK
View Post
"We are over 100% debt to GDP ratio"
How would secession solve this problem for RoT other than just skipping out on the bill? Would a secession cause a domino collapse of the US forcing immigrants from the north. Where there economies would not survive due to being land locked.
"the Congress no longer abides by the Constitution"
I dont agree, but I do agree on the implication that congress is broken. In any regards this problem can be fixed more easily than secession. Such solutions are term limits, being made accountable for their actions even after the term has ended, not being able financial profit off of committee's they belong to, barring the discussion of the party line and party affiliation (including separation) on the floor, and creating an open system of debates on the subjects that are vexing the US, and creating a better system for citizen's to address their concerns to the congress.
"refuses to enforce our borders, attacks states that do try to secure their border ... This presidency has seen the executive branch attack Arizona, Alabama and Florida over immigration laws and even more states under their voting laws."
There is a difference from national security, immigration, and racism. How would secession stop this? How do you deal with immigration along the other boarders?
"has increased the burden on states to support other states that have gone bankrupt due to liberal ideology. "
Secession wont create a right wing utopia that stops people from having differing ideas.
"what do you mean "at the cost of it's employees?" Do they not agree to work for xyz?"
In the last 50 years the average income for most of middle to low America has remained fairly flat and has not properly reflected the cost of living (such as gas prices). While the pay of the upper class has continually climbed. If this systematic greed was altered so that lower paid employees revived more substantial cost of living raises, it would allow people to meet a certain quality of life level that doesn't require governmental aid or use credit instead of cash. In addition those lower paid wage slaves could have their quality of living improved to point that the individual wage slave can take on the burden of healthcare issues and not leave it to the government (and the employer). A higher paid workforce would also equate to a larger taxable income to the government.
How would secession solve this problem for RoT other than just skipping out on the bill? Would a secession cause a domino collapse of the US forcing immigrants from the north. Where there economies would not survive due to being land locked.
"the Congress no longer abides by the Constitution"
I dont agree, but I do agree on the implication that congress is broken. In any regards this problem can be fixed more easily than secession. Such solutions are term limits, being made accountable for their actions even after the term has ended, not being able financial profit off of committee's they belong to, barring the discussion of the party line and party affiliation (including separation) on the floor, and creating an open system of debates on the subjects that are vexing the US, and creating a better system for citizen's to address their concerns to the congress.
"refuses to enforce our borders, attacks states that do try to secure their border ... This presidency has seen the executive branch attack Arizona, Alabama and Florida over immigration laws and even more states under their voting laws."
There is a difference from national security, immigration, and racism. How would secession stop this? How do you deal with immigration along the other boarders?
"has increased the burden on states to support other states that have gone bankrupt due to liberal ideology. "
Secession wont create a right wing utopia that stops people from having differing ideas.
"what do you mean "at the cost of it's employees?" Do they not agree to work for xyz?"
In the last 50 years the average income for most of middle to low America has remained fairly flat and has not properly reflected the cost of living (such as gas prices). While the pay of the upper class has continually climbed. If this systematic greed was altered so that lower paid employees revived more substantial cost of living raises, it would allow people to meet a certain quality of life level that doesn't require governmental aid or use credit instead of cash. In addition those lower paid wage slaves could have their quality of living improved to point that the individual wage slave can take on the burden of healthcare issues and not leave it to the government (and the employer). A higher paid workforce would also equate to a larger taxable income to the government.
Comment