Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Earth withering away.......

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Earth withering away.......

    Yahoo news desperate action for more viewing: Mention something about the earth dying off and we are all going to die
    The latest news and headlines from Yahoo News. Get breaking news stories and in-depth coverage with videos and photos.


    The world's biodiversity is down 30 percent since the 1970s, according to a new report, with tropical species taking the biggest hit. And if humanity continues as it has been, the picture could get bleaker.
    Humanity is outstripping the Earth's resources by 50 percent — essentially using the resources of one and a half Earths every year, according to the 2012 Living Planet Report, produced by conservation agency the World Wildlife Fund (WWF).
    Colby Loucks, the director of conservation sciences at WWF, compared humanity to bad houseguests.
    "We're emptying the fridge, we're not really taking care of the lawn, we're not weeding the flower beds and we're certainly not taking out the garbage," Loucks said. [50 Amazing Facts About Earth]
    Burning through resources
    The biannual Living Planet report is designed to call attention to the Earth's "invisible economy," said Emily McKenzie, the director of the WWF's Natural Capital Program. Natural resources — and the rate at which humans burn through them — rarely appear on policymakers' balance sheets, McKenzie said.
    But humanity is essentially in debt to Mother Earth, conservationists find. As of 2008, the most recent year for which data is available, humans were outstripping Earth's biocapacity by 50 percent. Biocapacity is the amount of renewable resources, land, and waste absorption (such as sinks for carbon dioxide) the Earth can provide. In other words, it takes the planet 1.5 years to restore what humanity burns through in a year. (The organization Global Footprint Network marks "Earth Overshoot Day" every year to draw attention to how fast humans use natural resources. In 2011, Earth Overshoot Day fell on Sept. 27, the day humans used up Earth's annual resources.)
    The report scientists calculated the world's hogs when it comes to resources (called the ecological footprint) by determining each nation's productive land capacity and comparing it to the actual population and consumption per person. The United States has the fifth-largest ecological footprint of any nation on Earth, according to the report.
    In order from most to least, the top 10 greediest resource users per capita are:
    Qatar
    Kuwait
    United Arab Emirates
    Denmark
    United States
    Belgium
    Australia
    Canada
    The Netherlands
    Ireland
    [See full list of top and bottom resource users]
    Struggling species
    All of this resource use is taking a toll. The Living Planet report also tracks biodiversity and species populations across the globe. This year's report details a startling loss of biodiversity around the globe: A loss of 30 percent of biodiversity on average, meaning a major decline in the number of different species of plants, animals and other organisms. Temperate species are doing relatively well, Loucks said, but tropical species have declined by 60 percent since the 1970s. Freshwater tropical species are the hardest-hit, having declined by 70 percent in that time period.
    Globally, terrestrial species declined by 25 percent between 1970 and 2008, WWF reports. Marine (non-freshwater) species declined by 20 percent.
    Many of the group's proposed solutions to humanity's out-of-control resource use center around Rio+20, the upcoming United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development set for June 20, 2012. The meeting is designed to help create pathways for sustainable development in the future, said Kate Newman, WWF's managing director of public sector initiatives. She cited the example of Mozambique, a poor country that may be home to one of the largest natural gas fields in the world. As international companies arrive to exploit this resource, local planners are concerned about how to make sure the entire nation benefits, she said.
    In the same way, global decision-makers need to think long-term, Loucks said.
    "As we're approaching a planet with 9 billion people on it, we need to find a global solution," he said. "The challenge for us is this is a long-term problem. This is the Earth for millennia. We need to move beyond the election cycle, beyond the quarterly report cycle."
    You can follow LiveScience senior writer Stephanie Pappas on Twitter @sipappas. Follow LiveScience for the latest in science news and discoveries on Twitter @livescience and on Facebook.
    Top 10 Ways to Destroy Earth
    Crowded Planet: 7 (Billion) Population Milestones
    The Reality of Climate Change: 10 Myths Busted
    Copyright 2012 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
    Originally posted by Buzzo
    Some dudes jump out of airplanes, I fuck hookers without condoms.

    sigpic

  • #2
    If we're using 1 and a half earths per year.....wouldn't we be empty at, oh..one year?
    I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

    Comment


    • #3
      The earth is tougher than the human race.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Denny View Post
        The earth is tougher than the human race.
        Exactly. Discovery just did a "After Humans" piece. Something like 35 years after the last human being, Earth would have restored 75% of our foot print and 100% after 75-100 years.
        Fuck you. We're going to Costco.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by kbscobravert View Post
          Exactly. Discovery just did a "After Humans" piece. Something like 35 years after the last human being, Earth would have restored 75% of our foot print and 100% after 75-100 years.
          Anyone who doesn't believe this, look at concrete drives and foundations on houses. Now, count the cracks and grass
          I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

          Comment


          • #6
            Each year, researchers report more than 15,000 new species

            Each year, researchers report more than 15,000 new species, and their workload shows no sign of letting up. “Ask any taxonomist in a museum, and they’ll tell you they have hundreds of species waiting to be described,” says Camilo Mora, a marine ecologist at the University of Hawaii.

            Scientists have named and cataloged 1.3 million species. How many more species there are left to discover is a question that has hovered like a cloud over the heads of taxonomists for two centuries.

            “It’s astounding that we don’t know the most basic thing about life,” said Boris Worm, a marine biologist at Dalhousie University in Nova Scotia.

            Don't worry about what you can't change.
            Do the best you can with what you have.
            Be honest, even if it hurts.

            "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery" ... Winston Churchill

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
              If we're using 1 and a half earths per year.....wouldn't we be empty at, oh..one year?
              They use an arbitrary unit called a global hectare, which is a rating of biological productivity of a land type - forests, agricultural areas, etc. As of 2003, they included about 62% of land surface and 5% aquatic surfaces as biologically productive. The global hectare count also includes energy sources, so as energy efficiency increases and with advances in agricultural and energy technology, total available global hectares expands as well. However, about half of the calculated global hectare usage in these models comes from carbon dioxide emission, which means if you exclude carbon dioxide, we're at 60% capacity with rising carbon dioxide levels as an ancillary concern. The inclusion of carbon footprint is why we aren't obviously outstripping the earth's resources.

              The carbon dioxide emission in these projections includes nuclear energy production calculated at rates equivalent to emissions from fossil fuel energy production. This is justified due to "inconclusive data about the long term area demand of nuclear power." I'd hazard a guess that carbon dioxide emissions are then less than purported, and deforestation numbers are overstated.


              How they come up with the global hectares standard:



              How they are applying this standard in measuring resource usage:
              Men have become the tools of their tools.
              -Henry David Thoreau

              Comment


              • #8
                bunch of fucking quacks.
                "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
                "A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler

                Comment


                • #9
                  This will lead to population control as well as the matrix.

                  While their science and numbers may be way off, the fact that the world population continues to grow the idea that more resources are needed is logical. We should take this time to eliminate a few billion people.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Sean88gt View Post
                    This will lead to population control as well as the matrix.

                    While their science and numbers may be way off, the fact that the world population continues to grow the idea that more resources are needed is logical. We should take this time to eliminate a few billion people.
                    we have the necessary tools. Might as well drop the bomb on people we don't care for.
                    "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
                    "A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by 5.0_CJ View Post
                      we have the necessary tools. Might as well drop the bomb on people we don't care for.
                      The banks would shit, screaming about the reduction in numbers of potential debtors.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Sean88gt View Post
                        This will lead to population control as well as the matrix.

                        While their science and numbers may be way off, the fact that the world population continues to grow the idea that more resources are needed is logical. We should take this time to eliminate a few billion people.
                        We have our Malthus fan.
                        Originally posted by davbrucas
                        I want to like Slow99 since people I know say he's a good guy, but just about everything he posts is condescending and passive aggressive.

                        Most people I talk to have nothing but good things to say about you, but you sure come across as a condescending prick. Do you have an inferiority complex you've attempted to overcome through overachievement? Or were you fondled as a child?

                        You and slow99 should date. You both have passive aggressiveness down pat.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by slow99 View Post
                          We have our Malthus fan.
                          He thought population control would allow for utopia. I don't think man could ever have utopia. I'm just saying mo people mo problems.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Population control will never work. Wars however, they work.
                            "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
                            "A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by 5.0_CJ View Post
                              Population control will never work. Wars however, they work.
                              I don't disagree, but our leaders are a group of beta males that don't understand scorched earth in regards to war, so going in to remove a billion wouldn't ever happen.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X