Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Texas teachers’ pension fund invests in casinos, loses $99 million

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Texas teachers’ pension fund invests in casinos, loses $99 million

    Home > Investigations > Headlines
    Texas teachers’ pension fund invests in casinos, loses $99 million
    A Text Size

    By STEVE McGONIGLE

    Staff Writer

    smcgonigle@dallasnews.com

    Published: 12 May 2012 10:21 PM
    Related

    As public investments go, this one looked like a roll of the dice.

    But the Teacher Retirement System of Texas wanted a big win, so it put $100 million into the buyout of a Las Vegas gaming company called Station Casinos.

    The company went bankrupt, and like many an unlucky jackpot-chaser, the state’s largest pension fund walked away a loser. More than $99 million of Texas teachers’ retirement money had vanished.

    “There is no getting around it,” said Britt Harris, the fund’s chief investment officer. “This was a bad investment.”

    It wasn’t the only one. Between April 2006 and last September, the teacher fund saw the value of its “opportunistic,” or high-risk, real estate deals drop by $599 million, a data analysis by The Dallas Morning News found.

    In all categories of real asset investments, including real estate, the worth of the TRS portfolio fell by more than $1 billion over that same period, according to the evaluation by The News.

    A spokesman for the teacher fund disputed the newspaper’s calculations The News on Friday, contending the decreases in high-risk real estate values were much less.

    TRS is the nation’s fifth-largest public pension provider, with current assets of $110 billion. It serves 1.3 million public education employees, about one-fourth of whom are retired.

    Like many pension plans, TRS faces a widening gap between assets and long-term obligations, a result of market volatility, tight state budgets and a rising tide of retirees. Last year, this unfunded liability reached $24 billion and forced the teacher fund to continue a decadelong freeze on increases in benefit payments.

    The response by TRS and other funds has been to shift from traditional stocks and bonds toward alternatives that offer higher returns but present larger risks.

    TRS has a higher share invested in alternative assets — 31 percent — than any of the 10 largest public pension funds, according to Preqin, a London-based research firm.

    Harris and other Texas fund officials credit the diversification with helping TRS to weather the global financial crisis better than most pension funds. In 2011, TRS had one of the highest returns of any state pension fund.

    TRS spokesman Howard Goldman, in a summary provided Friday, said more recent data than his office initially released to The News paints an upbeat picture of the last six years. When earnings are included, Goldman said, opportunistic investments have dropped $250 million, and the entire real asset portfolio gained $430 million.

    Critics contend alternatives are too risky, too costly and not transparent enough. They predict the investments will falter, leaving taxpayers with a massive bailout bill.

    Edward Siedle, a Florida lawyer who has investigated several public pension systems, including TRS, said the Texas fund’s alternative investments were typical. “We see every single day public pensions investing in schemes that make no sense and are doomed to fail,” he said.

    The $99 million Station Casinos loss was modest by TRS standards, said Harris, the chief investment officer. “No loss is insignificant. It’s still real money,” he said. “But it hasn’t affected the [overall] return on the fund.”


    I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

  • #2
    There's no telling how much payola was involved in that scam. LMAO at "hasn't affected the overall return of the fund".

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
      There's no telling how much payola was involved in that scam. LMAO at "hasn't affected the overall return of the fund".
      That loss is less than 1/1000th of the fund. A 1% return overall would make it painless.
      ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Yale View Post
        That loss is less than 1/1000th of the fund. A 1% return overall would make it painless.
        Maybe in total assets, but the "unfunded liability" was down to $24 billion and it was enough to continue a freeze. I'd say $100 million does make a difference. They certainly don't want to make too many of those deals.

        Comment


        • #5
          Glad texas is allowed to gamble with my pension! Why not just pay me more and not lose my money that I will probably never get to see anyway. A rumor most teachers have heard!

          Comment


          • #6
            Bet your ass that the decision makers made money.

            And those crackas shoulda hired Jody to make 'em money...
            www.allforoneroofing.com

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
              Maybe in total assets, but the "unfunded liability" was down to $24 billion and it was enough to continue a freeze. I'd say $100 million does make a difference. They certainly don't want to make too many of those deals.
              Right on.
              ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by mikec View Post
                Bet your ass that the decision makers made money.

                And those crackas shoulda hired Jody to make 'em money...
                Lol, I wouldn't have even been anywhere close to this deal ... I'm assuming it was made in the AI division. I was in on the internal equities side, then later on in external equities.
                Originally posted by davbrucas
                I want to like Slow99 since people I know say he's a good guy, but just about everything he posts is condescending and passive aggressive.

                Most people I talk to have nothing but good things to say about you, but you sure come across as a condescending prick. Do you have an inferiority complex you've attempted to overcome through overachievement? Or were you fondled as a child?

                You and slow99 should date. You both have passive aggressiveness down pat.

                Comment


                • #9
                  This is like making a news story that someone dropped a penny in a parking lot. It is a $110 billion fund that had a fantastic return in 2011 but lost $99 million on a single deal that didn't work out. Big deal. They probably made $8 billion on other deals. I guess that doesn't count though.
                  Originally posted by racrguy
                  What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
                  Originally posted by racrguy
                  Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Broncojohnny View Post
                    This is like making a news story that someone dropped a penny in a parking lot. It is a $110 billion fund that had a fantastic return in 2011 but lost $99 million on a single deal that didn't work out. Big deal. They probably made $8 billion on other deals. I guess that doesn't count though.
                    Point is, they're going for risky investments with teacher funds. I have no problem with this if they don't get bailed out. If they lose it all, teachers should be SOL
                    I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
                      Point is, they're going for risky investments with teacher funds. I have no problem with this if they don't get bailed out. If they lose it all, teachers should be SOL
                      They have $110 billion dollars under management, I'm not sure why they would need to be bailed out. Teachers should be SOL anyway, the government doesn't belong in the retirement business and defined benefit programs need to fucking die.
                      Originally posted by racrguy
                      What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
                      Originally posted by racrguy
                      Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Broncojohnny View Post
                        They have $110 billion dollars under management, I'm not sure why they would need to be bailed out. Teachers should be SOL anyway, the government doesn't belong in the retirement business and defined benefit programs need to fucking die.
                        Bingo. My point was if they take losses beyond what they can afford, the teachers should take the hit. They chose these people to represent them, they should take the burden of stupid decisions.
                        I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
                          Point is, they're going for risky investments with teacher funds. I have no problem with this if they don't get bailed out. If they lose it all, teachers should be SOL
                          Every investment has risks, some more than others. TRS did nothing wrong, they are bound by the Prudent Investor Law which states that the suitability of investments be judged in the context of the entire portfolio. Your larger point about a bailout I agree with.
                          Originally posted by davbrucas
                          I want to like Slow99 since people I know say he's a good guy, but just about everything he posts is condescending and passive aggressive.

                          Most people I talk to have nothing but good things to say about you, but you sure come across as a condescending prick. Do you have an inferiority complex you've attempted to overcome through overachievement? Or were you fondled as a child?

                          You and slow99 should date. You both have passive aggressiveness down pat.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X