Agenda 21 outlines the plan to takeover our world.

[line-em-up]

This is the first I have heard of it. 2005-2014 - The goal of the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Our children will be reindoctrinated to think the way they want them to think.

[91cavgt]

Agenda 21 is nothing new. It was agreed to and signed by Bush senior back in 93. You can do a search for Agenda 21 on any search engine and read up on what it entails directly off of the United Nations web site. It is VERY scary, and what is more scary is that it is 100% real.

[Denny]

Condescending, arrogant Paulie post alert!!!

[line-em-up]

...

Condescending, arrogant Paulie post alert!!!

Denny, I need some tips on what to do to prepare for this shit. You are welcome to pm if you'd like.

[Denny]

Denny, I need some tips on what to do to prepare for this shit. You are welcome to pm if you'd like.

Let me get back home and off this stupid phone.

[KBScobravert]

I only made it 1:41 before I couldn't take it anymore. Are these fucks really for real or are like the guy that keeps saying the end of the world is next week? There is no way anyone can think that they are going to "restructure the family unit", "abolition of private property".....

How about we go take all their shit, seperate their families to the far corners of the globe and tell them this is the world they want.

[line-em-up]

...

As I was watching it, I was thinking about the vacination law that Perry was supporting which would have forced the teenage girls to get shots. Kinda far fetched, I know. But it makes you think of how easy it would be to convince people to do it on their own. Just like the flu shots that people voluntarily get every year.

[thesource]

There are some truly evil bastards in this world.

[91CoupeMike]

Crap is real and it makes high gas prices make a lot more sense.

Sustainable development is world wide which would make it hard to fight.

IMO saving the planet is a good idea but making life shitty defeats the purpose.

[Snatch Napkin]

Gross.

I was looking up pics of that map and came across this website.

http://www.wasserauto.de/html/bio_diversity.html

EXPLANATION OF THE MAN AND THE BIOSPHERE PROGRAM, THE WILDLANDS
PROJECT AND THE BIODIVERSITY TREATY

The 1994 US Man and the Biosphere Strategic Plan notes that "U.S. Biosphere reserves act: important areas for developing the data, technology, and experience needed to implement the recommendations of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development.... (i.e. the Earth Summit in 1992). One of those recommendations is the Convention on Biological Diversity. Likewise the 1995 UN ESCO Statutes of the World Network of B iosphere Reserves that one of the primary purposes of the Man and the Biosphere (MAB) program is to "contribute to the objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity." Both documents state that the "core" or "protected areas" should be as large as possible and interconnected with wilderness-like corridors, all surrounded by "buffer zones" or "managed use areas" that are heavily regulated to be compatible with the wilderness core areas. This approach is mandated in Article 8a-e in the Convention on Biological Diversity and its companion document, the United Nations Global Biodiversity Assessment (GBA). Article 25 of the Convention mandates that the GBA be used to write the implementing language for the treaty. Section 13.4.2.2.3 of the GBA calls for "representative areas of all major ecosystems in a region...be reserved, that blocks should be as large as possible, that buffer zones should be established around core areas, and that corridors...connect these areas. This basic design is central to the recently proposed Wildlands Project in the United States, a controversial long-term strategy...to expand natural habitats and corridors to cover as much as 30% of the U.S. land area."

The Wildlands Project was developed by Dr. Michael Soule, cofounder and first president of the Society for Conservation Biology; Dr. Reed Ness, current editor for the journal of Conservation Biology and special consultant to the US Dept. of Interior; and David Foreman, co-founder and long-time leader of Earth First! and currently a member of the Board of the Sierra Club.

The Convention on Biological Diversity is centered on the science of conservation biology, which in turn was largely created by the IUCN ( International Union for Conservation of Nature). The IUCN is the lead organization which wrote and promoted the Convention on Biological Diversity. It is made up of over 500 national and international environmental and socialist groups known as NGOs (Non Governmental Organizations)and is itself an accredited NGO with the United Nations. The IUCN received diplomatic immunity from law suits on January 19, 1996 by President Clinton (Exec. Order 12986). To date the science of conservation biology is based on nothing more than unproven theories. See the pamphlet entitled The Philosophy, Politics and Science of Biological Diversity for a more complete discussion of conservation biology.

MAGNITUDE OF THE WILDLANDS PROJECT

"Conservation must be practiced on a truly grand scale," claims Kred Ness. And grand it is. Ness provides the whopping dimensions of this effort in the article "The Wildlands Project: Land Conservation Strategy," 1992 special issue of Wild Earth. The United Nations GBA cites this article as foundational to recovery of biodiversity.

(Red) Core reserves are wiIderness areas that supposedly allow biodiversity to flourish. "it is estimated," claims Ness, "that large carnivores and undulates require reserves on the scale of 2.5 to 25 million acres.

... For a minimum viable population of 1000 [large mammals], the figures would be 242 million acres for grizly bears, 200 million acres for wolverines, and 100 million acres for wolves. Core reserves should be managed as roadless areas (wilderness). All roads should be permanently closed."

(Red) Corridors are "extensions of reserves. ... Multiple corridors interconnecting a network of core reserves provide functional redundancy and mitigate against disturbance....

Corridors several miles wide are needed if the objective is to maintain resident populations of large carnivores."

(Yellow) Buffer zones should have two or more zones "so that a gradation of use intensity exists from the core reserve to the developed landscape. Inner zones should have low road density (no more than

0.5 mile/square mile) and low-intensity use such as. . .hiking, cross-country skiing, birding, primitive camping, wilderness hunting and fishing, and low-intensity silviculture (light selective cutting). Outer zones may have higher road densities (but still no more than 1 mile/ square mile)...and heavier recreational use (but no off-road vehicles) and campgrounds. New forestry silviculture (e.g., partial retention harvests), selection forestry, or other forestry experiments" would be permitted. More intensive harvesting would not be allowed.

The result of these guidelines is the map on the previous page.

WHAT DO RESERVES AND CORRIDORS REALLY MEAN?

While this effort has a noble mission, the implications are staggering. As noted in the June 25, 1993 issue of Science, it "is nothing less than the transformation of America to an archipelago of human inhabited islands surrounded by natural areas. "

Although 100 million acres of core area might be required for 1000 wolves, the total land area of Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut, is only 71 million acres. It would mean the nationalization of private land through regulation or other means, forcing people to move to areas zoned for occupation, and possibly shutting down half of the agriculture, forest products, and mining industries--all resuiting in massive unemployment. Scarce resources mean the rest of us are going to pay double and triple for products made from these resources like food, toilet paper, and automobiles.

RESERVES & CORRIDORS DO NOT WORK

What science is really showing is that there is no clear evidence that reserves and corridors work or are even needed. Rather, good forest management, including the use of clearcutting, enhances biodiversity and sustainability:

"The theory has not been properly validated and the practical value of biogeographic principles for conservation remains unknown. .
.. The theory provides no special insights relevant to conservation." Zimmerman, B.L. and R.O. Bierregaard. 1986. Journal of Biogeography 13:133-143.
The theory behind the need for reserves and corridors is being "increasingly heavily criticized.. .as inapplicable to most of nature, largely because local population extinction was not demonstrated." Simberloff. D. J. Farr, J. Cox, and D. Mehlman. 1992. "Movement Corridors:
Conservation Bargains or Poor Investment?" Conservation Biology 6(4):495.
"No unified theory combines genetic, demographic, and other forces threatening small populations, nor is their accord on the relative importance of these threats." Ibid.
"There are still few data, and many widely cited reports are unconvincing.... [The theory that reserves and corridors "facilitate movement is now almost an article of faith." Ibid.
"Studies that have been frequently cited as illustrating corridor use for faunal movement, do not, in fact, provide clear evidence." Of those that do support the need for corridors, wooded fence rows are adequate for many species, while only a few require well vegetated strips. Hobbs, R.J. 1992. "The Role of Corridors in Conservation: Solution or Bandwagon?" Tree 7(11):389.

The science used in the MAB and Convention on Biological Diversity does not work and may actually reduce biodiversity. The implications of this treaty must be thoroughly reviewed before it is considered for ratification.

For more information on the maps and Wildlands Project. contact Dr. Michael Coffman, Maine Conservation Rights Institute, (207) 945-9878

Quelle

[thesource]

It's really getting to the point of a revolution in this country. At the pace we are on, I give it 10 years tops.

[91cavgt]

It is refreshing to finally see some of you taking this seriously.

[LANTIRN]

Judging by the replies I probably don't want to watch it; I spend enough time pissed the government as it is. I am feeling good tonight; why go and fuck up a good mood?

[Armedtrigger01]

Wow I don't see them pulling this off without a major revolution in which the goverment kills a lot of people which of course helps make those areas unpopulated way easier.

[91CoupeMike]

Wow I don't see them pulling this off without a major revolution in which the goverment kills a lot of people which of course helps make those areas unpopulated way easier.

To bad it's already happening.

The UN says the WORLD can only sustain 1 billion or million (hard to hear in video) people at most.

Genocide would be the way to do it. To think the average person would have a fighting chance against military forces is comical, if you think they wouldn't bomb rebels, think again. Sustaining life and saving innocent people would be out the window. Think about that for a while. You can shoot your plinkers at tanks while they doze over your house and throw you in a mass grave when it's over with. They say the people who help work for sustainable development are exempt from it. Their life over yours.

The scary part is the majority of the people who are making it possible aren't even aware of what they are doing in the long wrong run.

The media will convince the simpletons to do it to themselves by having them fight to force amendments to make you defenseless. (Treyvon for example). If you think stuff like like is reported by random, I sad to say youre mistaken.

It's all part of a plan, and we are being played like little finger puppets. Theres nothing you can do now, it's been in effect to long and the whole world is on board with it. You can revolt one but good luck revolting them all.

History will repeat itself, it always does. Hitler paved the way, they learned from that.

I hope I'm wrong, so I'll live my life normally but to think that's it's impossible is kind of foolish.