Originally posted by 32vfromhell
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Romney is so consistent
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Vertnut View PostPray tell, who do you think would beat Barry? Your emotion is overtaking common sense.
As for who I think would beat Obama, my answer is that none of the candidates in the GOP primary could do it. My personal favorite is Gingrich, since he seems to have a good handle on what the problems with the country are, and has enough spine to implement what will be needed to fix them. I'm sure you have a few reasons that he's an unelectable dumbass, and I would probably even agree with them.
It really doesn't matter what I think though, as the Republicans have decided that the slick-haired shyster is their horse. I just don't think he will get enough support from minorities and young whites to do stop Obama from getting a second term. Based on recent voting patterns, the Republicans may think they can get a polished but spineless lying sack of crap voted in. I just don't think it's going to work out for them this time.
Originally posted by Avery'sDad View PostMeanwhile the guy down the street who has inadvertently aerated his lawn by changing yard signs from Ron Paul to Michelle Bachmann to Sarah Palin to Herman Cain back to Michelle Bachmann to Newt Gingrich to Rick Santorum will, at last, put up his Romney sign and tell everyone he's backed Mitt from day one.
(just enjoy my passive aggressiveness in not naming them)When the government pays, the government controls.
Comment
-
First of all, Romney is only the second-worst republian nominee in recent history, the worst was John McCain... but the dude is still a slick haired bullshit politician to the bone.
Even if he were to be elected, which I don't believe he will be, I don't see him changing in any meaningful way the path in which our country is going.
As I say often, we're fucked... period.
And as far as this election is concerned, no way does Romney beat the "chosen one".... it's a done deal for 4 more years.... and with the typical 21st century American voter, the next guy won't be any better:
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by waycooljr View PostDid people hate on Bush during this time ? That was a little before my time . Seems like Romeny sure catches a lot of grief from his own "side"
Comment
-
Originally posted by 46Tbird View PostEmotion? My emotion is "despair" in that the Republican candidate selection makes me want to puke.
As for who I think would beat Obama, my answer is that none of the candidates in the GOP primary could do it. My personal favorite is Gingrich, since he seems to have a good handle on what the problems with the country are, and has enough spine to implement what will be needed to fix them. I'm sure you have a few reasons that he's an unelectable dumbass, and I would probably even agree with them.
It really doesn't matter what I think though, as the Republicans have decided that the slick-haired shyster is their horse. I just don't think he will get enough support from minorities and young whites to do stop Obama from getting a second term. Based on recent voting patterns, the Republicans may think they can get a polished but spineless lying sack of crap voted in. I just don't think it's going to work out for them this time.
Awesome. This reminds me of some forum members here.
(just enjoy my passive aggressiveness in not naming them)
This is simply untrue. "Young Whites" dislike Obama much more across the board now than they did in 2008. I honestly hqve not come across one person who voted for Barry in 08 who will vote for him again. No, they are not too excited for a Romney12 ticket, however, they are glad to see Obama leave.
Comment
-
Originally posted by matts5.0 View Postmy vote wont be the deciding vote here in texas, so meh..
StevoOriginally posted by SSMAN...Welcome to the land of "Fuck it". No body cares, and if they do, no body cares.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jw33 View PostSmooth talker, looks presidential, very wealthy, doesn't rock the boat, and has the media's nod."It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."
Comment
Comment