Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama tells Bishops off

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Yale View Post
    What about state mandated auto insurance?
    Driving is a privilege you have to take tests and get a license to exercise that privilege. You don't have to get a license to exist (yet) and there is no constitutional power for the FEDERAL government to say a word about insurance of any sort. If states want it, they are empowered under the 10th to enact it but the FEDERAL government lacks that power
    I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by racrguy View Post
      Do you not see the benefits of having birth control covered by insurance?
      Do you see constitutional authority for the federal government to make any mandate of any sort on insurance?
      I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Yale View Post
        They're not considering that birth control is used by a lot of women for hormonal therapy, so they should cover it
        My wife is one of them. We pay $36 for a 3 month supply.

        Comment


        • #19
          So do Catholic priests use birth control when they rape the little boys or what?

          Comment


          • #20
            It boils down to the fact that the GOP are some women hating SOBs.

            Comment


            • #21
              Yes, because the GOP made that pic. They also voted themselves into office. The tens of thousands of people pulling the levers at the voting booth had absolutely nothing to do with who was actually elected.


              Out of curiosity, how many shirts do you drool on, on a day to day basis?
              www.allforoneroofing.com

              Comment


              • #22
                Funny how the libs have made birth control a major issue for this election. Really? Come on. The worst POTUS in the history of this nation, and birth control is a real biggie? Talk about a head-fake! Let's just keep everyone's mind off of $3.70 gal gas, 8.3% unemployment (if you actually believe it's that low), and socialized medicine.

                By the way, Gallup is showing 9.1 unemployment as we speak, and Barry is lobbying (again) the senate to vote against the Keystone Pipeline project (again).
                Last edited by Vertnut; 03-08-2012, 03:36 PM.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Avery'sDad View Post
                  It boils down to the fact that the GOP are some women hating SOBs.

                  http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Sn9IWgl12k...enis-heads.JPG
                  You know, you're almost not even worth responding to. Another Obama bot zombie. So you're saying the left didn't attack Palin? Or Bachman? Or are they not women?
                  I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by mikec View Post
                    Yes, because the GOP made that pic. They also voted themselves into office. The tens of thousands of people pulling the levers at the voting booth had absolutely nothing to do with who was actually elected.


                    Out of curiosity, how many shirts do you drool on, on a day to day basis?
                    Says allot about the constituents.

                    Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
                    Funny how the libs have made birth control a major issue for this election. Really? Come on. The worst POTUS in the history of this nation, and birth control is a real biggie? Talk about a head-fake! Let's just keep everyone's mind off of $3.70 gal gas, 8.3% unemployment (if you actually believe it's that low), and socialized medicine.

                    By the way, Gallup is showing 9.1 unemployment as we speak, and Barry is lobbying (again) the senate to vote against the Keystone Pipeline project (again).
                    You mean that pipeline that would be used to deliver oil from Canada only to export it from the gulf. The one that would create 20,000 200,000 400,000 1 million jobs. (whats the number now?). The one that would magically lower the price of gas, even though the other ones in existence haven't. Besides it was only rejected on the bases of the GOP wanted to expedite building without regard of any environmental impact. This pipeline will have no effect on you, me, the price of gas or jobs of any significant amount. It will get built, just not haphazardly.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
                      You know, you're almost not even worth responding to. Another Obama bot zombie. So you're saying the left didn't attack Palin? Or Bachman? Or are they not women?
                      I usually don't respond to you cause your a FOX bot. I'll make an exception this time. I'm saying women in general. Viagra was ok, but if a woman needs anything then all hell breaks loose. The left wasn't attacking Palin and Bachman because they are women, they were attacking them because every time they opened their mouth, stupid poured out. Don't worry though, Santorum falls in that list as well.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
                        Poor example. Driving isn't a "right", it's a privilege. If you don't want, or can't afford insurance, don't drive.
                        I'm going to have to disagree. In a true free society. There is no such thing as a privilege. Privileges can be revoked. The government does not have the right to tell any one they can not do something (revoking a privilege) as long as what your doing does not infringe on the rights of others. The state on the other hand can do this.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Avery'sDad View Post
                          I usually don't respond to you cause your a FOX bot. I'll make an exception this time. I'm saying women in general. Viagra was ok, but if a woman needs anything then all hell breaks loose. The left wasn't attacking Palin and Bachman because they are women, they were attacking them because every time they opened their mouth, stupid poured out. Don't worry though, Santorum falls in that list as well.
                          You mean "you're" not "your". If a woman needs anything, she has the ability to go pay $3.00 a month to get birth control or find an insurance company that provides it. Perhaps you can show me in the constitution where the federal government has the ability to demand anything about insurance.

                          And Rush wasn't attacking this bitch because she was a woman. She was attacked because she evidently spends 3k a year on bc which everyone else can get for 3 bucks a month and has decided that since she likes fucking, WE should be paying for it.
                          I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
                            Do you see constitutional authority for the federal government to make any mandate of any sort on insurance?
                            Doesn't the interstate commerce clause apply?
                            ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              No, as insurance policies are sold intrastate, not interstate. If you have a policy through an in state provider, doesn't apply. Read the Commerce Clause.

                              Article I, Section 8, Clause 3:[2]

                              [The Congress shall have Power] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes;
                              I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
                                No, as insurance policies are sold intrastate, not interstate. If you have a policy through an in state provider, doesn't apply. Read the Commerce Clause.

                                Article I, Section 8, Clause 3:[2]

                                [The Congress shall have Power] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes;
                                You don't have to quote it. I didn't realize they were all intrastate. Thanks.
                                ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X