This could be bad

[racrguy]

Thats some awesome proof he was intentionally shot in the head

If they didnt want to disperse, its their fucking problem. The police came in after demonstrators would not leave when they were supposed to and someone got hurt. Im sure the police enjoyed pelting people with rubber bullets...who wouldnt?

[Forever_frost]

I'm seeing a couple of people demonstrating while in uniform, a violation of UCMJ. Wonder how they like being E1?

[SMEGMA STENCH]

Hell, they don't even know

Ha a vip member got banned.

But yeah I think they just want free money. Like that one guy that just wanted a free cheeseburger.

[Rough Customer]

My next AR15 build will use a marked "Less than lethal" lower receiver. That way when I kill people with it I can say that I did not use deadly force.

[Bassics]

So, the police using force, and potentially murdering someone in what, by all appearances, is a non-violent protest in attempt to get a governmental redress of grievances is acceptable?

So much for the First Amendment.

What redress of greivances?

All I've seen is a bunch of catchphrases that threatens me and my livelihood.

[Forever_frost]

And they aren't asking for a redress of grievances from the government, they want it from private business. Thus, they should be in DC

[kingjason]

Not only does that video show that he was in an area that was clearly barricaded off, but also zero proof he was shot on purpose. Oh and I loveeee the way they talk about the bomb thrown at them. Wow nice propaganda. If he was shot in the head on purpose then that is some bullshit and someone should have their ass handed to them. Also how would you suggest they get the gas into the crowd? You think they can shoot it between their legs and into the middle of the crowd? Makes no difference either whether he was a Marine or not, hell I have plenty that work with me. Hell these days there are plenty of imposters so you never know.

So military guys let me ask you this. Lets say you are in Iraq and someone crosses over a barricade to protest. Whats gonna happen to that guy?

I also love the pic of the Officer standing there smilling which was clearly taken at a differerent time.

I am not defending the police or picking on that guy but damn lets not make this something it is not.

[Forever_frost]

I can answer that one. Depending on our orders we

1. Take the man, detain him and after checking into his background, release him

2. Push him back

3. Tell him to step back, then make him do so following the Rules of Escalation of Force.

[03trubluGT]

Anytime someone wants to further an agenda, they either hide behinde their "rights" or religion.

[SMEGMA STENCH]

You still have to wonder why he got shot in the head. Its pretty easy to just aim at his gut. Especially when you're standing 20 feet in front of him and you know he'll only be pained, not really wounded.

[Forever_frost]

Anyone who's fired a 40mm knows it travels in an arc. For them to hit him in the head, with the exception of point blank range (which this wasn't) you'd have to arc it at him and it's very difficult to do. I challenge those who think the police did this or did this intentionally, to explain how a 40mm grenade, fired in an arc can purposely hit anyone when you're dealing with a mob

[ceyko]

Anyone who's fired a 40mm knows it travels in an arc. For them to hit him in the head, with the exception of point blank range (which this wasn't) you'd have to arc it at him and it's very difficult to do. I challenge those who think the police did this or did this intentionally, to explain how a 40mm grenade, fired in an arc can purposely hit anyone when you're dealing with a mob

Fair enough and if it's anything like the M203 (40mm) there is a reason it has separate sights. Even then it is a relatively slow moving projectile...

[onemeangixxer7502]

Why the fuck is the guy with the bullet bruise bitching, he's not even from the country. HAHA

[Forever_frost]

Fair enough and if it's anything like the M203 (40mm) there is a reason it has separate sights. Even then it is a relatively slow moving projectile...

Exactly. From what I've played with, the launchers can be like the old M79 launchers or the 6 round ones. They don't do direct fire. You can aim at something but depending on distance, you're going to be shooting VERY low.

I want to see racr explain that. He's adamant that the police shot this idiot intentionally. I want him to explain how that is since you can't aim the launcher like a gun, you have to aim it like a 203

[Up0n0ne]

Anytime someone wants to further an agenda, they either hide behinde their "rights" or religion.

Or trample on the Constitution, call for bailouts at the taxpayers expense, sign directives that abolishes the Peoples rights, unlawfully use their power, ship guns to Mexico, have drugs shipped in, have al qaeda as govt. assets, help grow opium in Afghan, force the People to buy something, commit war crimes, plant drugs, deal drugs, "kettling, pose as anarchist to enduce violence, cause finacial callapses, govt. insider trading, pull false flags over and over, sell our national parks as collateral, illegal check points, disarm the American people, conduct warrantless searches of the American people, their homes, vehicles, papers, or effects -- such as warrantless house-to house searches for weapons or persons, detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to trial by military tribunal, impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state, or to enter with force into a state, without the express consent and invitation of that state’s legislature and governor, confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies, under any emergency pretext whatsoever, infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances, etc.

The last few are the "Declaration Of Orders We Will Not Obey" from OathKeepers.org
Thankfully there are some that take their Oath seriously.

You should re-read the Oath you took to protect the People's "rights" and our Constitution, regardless if you agree with them or not. If you don't agree with them, maybe you're in the wrong profession.

Officers Oath
I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God

Your Oath NEVER expires! It's time to keep it!