I never really care much for the guy over the years I've been following him. And his record obviously has some questions... especially on healthcare and gun control. But that is not the main reason I'm getting sick of him. In the last 4 debates he's been a bickering little bitch that has the sole intention of talking over people, and shutting down criticism. I just don't like it.
So, that leaves me with a decision on who I'd like to support.
Herman Cain - I like the guy. I've liked him since he stuck it to Clinton in that town hall meeting. I trust that he will do the right thing, however I know that his lack of experience will cause him to lean heavily on advisers. And I don't get to vote for them. And that, I don't like.
Rick Perry - He's rock solid on the 2nd amendment, he's a conservative, and I do completely trust he will do what he perceives is right. He is weak on illegal immigration, but I feel that of all the candidates, he would work hardest to fix the issue with his experience. Perry is solid as far as I'm concerned, and I trust him to do what he says.
Newt Gingrich - I feel Newt is by far the most experienced of all the candidates, and he would eat Obama for breakfast. It's quite tempting to vote for him just to see this happen, as it would be all that I've ever wanted to see. However, everyone always talks about his 'baggage' which I presume is the fact he divorced his wife when the media said she was on her death bed (she's fine), and when he shut down the house (which was just threatened by Boehner a few months ago). That doesn't seem like too much, and boy he's a slick talker. However, he has had a few dumbass moves I can recall recently, and I'm a little concerned about his republican cronism, but overall I know he's the most capable of getting done what he says he will. He knows the political engine better than anyone.
Ron Paul - Quite possibly the best voice on domestic fiscal and constitutional issues. I like the guy, and I know he's damn set on shrinking government. I would vote for him in a heartbeat if it wasn't for his damn foreign policy. It's abysmal, it always has been. His message is so perfect for conservatives, it's just a damn shame it comes with that abysmal foreign policy. Because of that he's unelectable. This is his 3rd attempt, and he's failed every time because of that one issue. He would be a shoe in if it were not for that.
Rick Santorum - Great conservative. I think he's probably the only real true conservative up there. The problem is money and his personality. He isn't spectacular or extraordinary, his voice falls to the back. I'd vote for him if he had a chance.
So, what do you guys think? Seems as if our time to choose is quickly evaporating, but the candidates are not thinning out.
So, that leaves me with a decision on who I'd like to support.
Herman Cain - I like the guy. I've liked him since he stuck it to Clinton in that town hall meeting. I trust that he will do the right thing, however I know that his lack of experience will cause him to lean heavily on advisers. And I don't get to vote for them. And that, I don't like.
Rick Perry - He's rock solid on the 2nd amendment, he's a conservative, and I do completely trust he will do what he perceives is right. He is weak on illegal immigration, but I feel that of all the candidates, he would work hardest to fix the issue with his experience. Perry is solid as far as I'm concerned, and I trust him to do what he says.
Newt Gingrich - I feel Newt is by far the most experienced of all the candidates, and he would eat Obama for breakfast. It's quite tempting to vote for him just to see this happen, as it would be all that I've ever wanted to see. However, everyone always talks about his 'baggage' which I presume is the fact he divorced his wife when the media said she was on her death bed (she's fine), and when he shut down the house (which was just threatened by Boehner a few months ago). That doesn't seem like too much, and boy he's a slick talker. However, he has had a few dumbass moves I can recall recently, and I'm a little concerned about his republican cronism, but overall I know he's the most capable of getting done what he says he will. He knows the political engine better than anyone.
Ron Paul - Quite possibly the best voice on domestic fiscal and constitutional issues. I like the guy, and I know he's damn set on shrinking government. I would vote for him in a heartbeat if it wasn't for his damn foreign policy. It's abysmal, it always has been. His message is so perfect for conservatives, it's just a damn shame it comes with that abysmal foreign policy. Because of that he's unelectable. This is his 3rd attempt, and he's failed every time because of that one issue. He would be a shoe in if it were not for that.
Rick Santorum - Great conservative. I think he's probably the only real true conservative up there. The problem is money and his personality. He isn't spectacular or extraordinary, his voice falls to the back. I'd vote for him if he had a chance.
So, what do you guys think? Seems as if our time to choose is quickly evaporating, but the candidates are not thinning out.
Comment