The Republicans are playing a cynical political game with hugely high economic stakes

[Forever_frost]

Eh, it's a hobby. I like to test myself against liberals and keep sharp.

[Venix]

Just to stir the pot:


Flat tax, with no deductions, exemptions, loop holes, or any other leaks. Nuff Said

Sure people will hide money, but don't they already?


Edit: Also, limit government aid to 2 children per household as being claimed, for ANY reason. No aid or credits given, period, over 2 children. If you want 15, thats your deal, we shouldn't have to feed them.

[Denny]

Just to stir the pot:


Flat tax, with no deductions, exemptions, loop holes, or any other leaks. Nuff Said

Sure people will hide money, but don't they already?


Edit: Also, limit government aid to 2 children per household as being claimed, for ANY reason. No aid or credits given, period, over 2 children. If you want 15, thats your deal, we shouldn't have to feed them.

I would be OK with something like this.

[Forever_frost]

Just to stir the pot:


Flat tax, with no deductions, exemptions, loop holes, or any other leaks. Nuff Said

Sure people will hide money, but don't they already?


Edit: Also, limit government aid to 2 children per household as being claimed, for ANY reason. No aid or credits given, period, over 2 children. If you want 15, thats your deal, we shouldn't have to feed them.

I like this idea, but we have to go further and say if you're on welfare, you're on a works program working for that welfare check. Think of the New Deal one. You go in 40 hours a week for training and working and you get your welfare check. It has a time limit that you can use it and once you use it, you're done.

[Vertnut]

No, it hasn't. Too many people point to the massive increase in federal deficit but, probably knowingly, conveniently ignore that the Obama administration moved both war theaters back onto the budget. Bush hid those numbers by keeping them off-budget.

Even a hard-core socialist as yourself, has to see the lies that Barry has constantly thrown out there. Hell, we shouldn't even BE in war (much less Libya), according to his campaign speech. GITMO is still flourishing (he was going to close it immediately), and unemployment was going to stay at 8% after he spent $750,000,000,000 in a bogus "stimulus package". You're not this stupid, are you? You're like Punxsutawney Phil: everytime you pop out, we have six more weeks of your bullshit.

[DON SVO]

Go back and read your posts. You said they don't pay any federal taxes. Not once did you mention it's only the federal income tax they don't pay.

You know exactly what he meant. You're playing semantics to piss him off and, in doing so, completely debasing any seemingly relevant point you're trying to make.

It's hilarious that you want to go after people making ~$50k/yr but raising taxes on the extremely wealthy, who only pay about 17% anyway due to a shitty tax code, is taboo. You're out of your kool-aid drinking mind.

Yes. The 47ish percent that pay NOTHING into our federal income tax yet are the primary recipients of entitlement programs/pet projects/subsidations/etc need to pay in to some extent. Those programs are funded by the other 53ish percent and, basically, you're saying that since they make more money... they should pay even more so that the ones who don't pay can continue NOT paying but still getting handouts?

Don't you see the folly in your own statement?

[Geor!]

You know exactly what he meant. You're playing semantics to piss him off and, in doing so, completely debasing any seemingly relevant point you're trying to make.



Yes. The 47ish percent that pay NOTHING into our federal income tax yet are the primary recipients of entitlement programs/pet projects/subsidations/etc need to pay in to some extent. Those programs are funded by the other 53ish percent and, basically, you're saying that since they make more money... they should pay even more so that the ones who don't pay can continue NOT paying but still getting handouts?

Don't you see the folly in your own statement?

Liberals just don't see things that way, dude.

They (Democrats) are a party chock full of double standards. IE: the rich should pay higher taxes to help the poor, except for me of course because I'll find any loophole to not pay my "fair share," or just create the loopholes if there isn't one there already (see General Electric).

[Jimbo]

Just to stir the pot:


Flat tax, with no deductions, exemptions, loop holes, or any other leaks. Nuff Said

Sure people will hide money, but don't they already?


Edit: Also, limit government aid to 2 children per household as being claimed, for ANY reason. No aid or credits given, period, over 2 children. If you want 15, thats your deal, we shouldn't have to feed them.

I like that, a lot. Where the hell did you come from, with the reasonable ideas?

[Venix]

I like that, a lot. Where the hell did you come from, with the reasonable ideas?

Say the same idea to the far right, or the far left, and they would both tell you I'm insane. Say it to a reasonable person, and it sounds kinda nice.

[noshine4mine]

LOL. You are pants-on-head retarded, friend. I can't handle you anymore.

Who the fuck are you? I am pretty sure ForeverFrost was asked to meet the POTUS because of his opinion...only people listening to you are a bunch of assholes that think they can fix social problems with other peoples money.

[The King]

Even a hard-core socialist as yourself, has to see the lies that Barry has constantly thrown out there. Hell, we shouldn't even BE in war (much less Libya), according to his campaign speech. GITMO is still flourishing (he was going to close it immediately), and unemployment was going to stay at 8% after he spent $750,000,000,000 in a bogus "stimulus package". You're not this stupid, are you? You're like Punxsutawney Phil: everytime you pop out, we have six more weeks of your bullshit.

A true gem there........

[Forever_frost]

Who the fuck are you? I am pretty sure ForeverFrost was asked to meet the POTUS because of his opinion...only people listening to you are a bunch of assholes that think they can fix social problems with other peoples money.

I have been to Congress 4 times last year and 3 this year to talk to the house and senate arms committees, was at the resigning of the Americans with Disabilities act with his boy Barry (who snubbed us vets completely and refused to even look at us), I was pelosi's guest of honor at the Christmas tree lighting last year (she tried to take the seats from us vets to give to other VIP's) and so forth. I stay on top of things

[Broncojohnny]

Uh, yeah.

Uh no.

The only thing all this shit says is that tax cuts were passed and the public held more debt.

Making the claim that it is better to raise taxes and let the government take money out of the economy and spend it on useless shit is better than letting that money flow to capital markets or consumer spending follows along perfectly with every other retarded thing you have posted on this website.

Since you think the government taking money from people is better, go ahead and lay out your theory as to why that is true. No charts and graphs, lets hear your logic as to why $1 in my pocket does more for the economy if I send it to Washington rather than spend it or invest it.

[Cannonball996]

simple fix, cut spending, close loop holes, and end subsidies.

[Durantula]

You know exactly what he meant. You're playing semantics to piss him off and, in doing so, completely debasing any seemingly relevant point you're trying to make.

Hah, no I'm not. He said repeatedly 47% of Americans don't pay federal taxes. There are a lot more than just one federal tax. Perhaps he should be more specific next time.

Yes. The 47ish percent that pay NOTHING into our federal income tax yet are the primary recipients of entitlement programs/pet projects/subsidations/etc need to pay in to some extent. Those programs are funded by the other 53ish percent and, basically, you're saying that since they make more money... they should pay even more so that the ones who don't pay can continue NOT paying but still getting handouts?

Don't you see the folly in your own statement?

Ah, another person who failed to read the links I posted. If you had, you'd have seen that only about 10% of the 47% not paying federal income taxes are paying zero taxes and taking welfare checks. The other 37% are middle class (~$50k/yr) families that don't pay the federal income tax due to tax credits. They still pay other federal taxes as well as state and local taxes.