Originally posted by Denny
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Obama says he cannot guarantee Social Security checks will go out on August 3
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Lason View PostSo by your logic, if Fidelity takes off with your 401K when you decide to retire then owell, you should have taken care of it when you were young? They were forced to pay into SS with the understanding that their money would be there waiting on them when they retired.
We need to get rid of SS but we do not need to start with the people already collecting!
I can appreciate the view that they "paid into it" their whole life. But the facts are that they did not pay into anything. The money they paid was spent by the people they elected. And they did nothing about it. Just like the money I pay in today is being spent. So, exactly who is to blame here? We can start with FDR. Then we can blame the government in general. Then we can blame the old people who did nothing to change the system forty years ago when politicians started raiding social security's surplus funding. We can also blame them right now, they have the most powerful lobby in Washington, the AARP, yet they won't do anything. Am I blame for their situation? No, I am not. Yet somehow I am the guy who is supposed to pay for it all because the government made a promise. Somehow it is ok to rob me using a ballot box instead of a gun. It is more acceptable to do it that way. How the hell does that make any sense to anyone with a brain?
Fact is, Paul Ryan came up with a plan that would change social security for anyone under the age of 40. It wouldn't affect anyone currently collecting benefits. It wouldn't change anything for anyone who would collect in the next 18 years. But he got laughed at and ignored. In fact, the Democrats used it as another chance to scare old people. Since no one wants to change anything and I'm expected to pay for it, I say fuck the old people. I'm getting real tired of caring.Originally posted by racrguyWhat's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?Originally posted by racrguyVoting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Comment
-
since i've been old enough to pay taxes, i've seen it as nothing more than a cost of doing business. Never did i expect to get anything back. How can SS payed on income levels from 30-40 years ago be expected to create enough of "today's value" of money to even be worth while? Fuck everybody and their 401k's, you aren't allowed to bitch when you loose your kid's college money gambling in vegas......401k's are gambling your money in the market the exact same way. on a side note........bunch of motherfuckers in here that don't work it sounds like, if you have no arms and legs from serving this country that's perfectly understandable and i have no problem with my money taking care of Vets in need. But able bodied vets can fend for themselves.pinto gt with wood trim
Comment
-
Originally posted by Broncojohnny View PostIf Fidelity could "take off" with my 401k then they would never manage it.
I can appreciate the view that they "paid into it" their whole life. But the facts are that they did not pay into anything. The money they paid was spent by the people they elected. And they did nothing about it. Just like the money I pay in today is being spent. So, exactly who is to blame here? We can start with FDR. Then we can blame the government in general. Then we can blame the old people who did nothing to change the system forty years ago when politicians started raiding social security's surplus funding. We can also blame them right now, they have the most powerful lobby in Washington, the AARP, yet they won't do anything. Am I blame for their situation? No, I am not. Yet somehow I am the guy who is supposed to pay for it all because the government made a promise. Somehow it is ok to rob me using a ballot box instead of a gun. It is more acceptable to do it that way. How the hell does that make any sense to anyone with a brain?
Fact is, Paul Ryan came up with a plan that would change social security for anyone under the age of 40. It wouldn't affect anyone currently collecting benefits. It wouldn't change anything for anyone who would collect in the next 18 years. But he got laughed at and ignored. In fact, the Democrats used it as another chance to scare old people. Since no one wants to change anything and I'm expected to pay for it, I say fuck the old people. I'm getting real tired of caring.
This is that far right wing mentality that people from the far left use time and time to scare everyone.....
"Who cares what plans you made your whole life to plan retirement. If it hurts me then we are going to take it from you because honestly, I dont care about you."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lason View Post"Who cares what plans you made your whole life to plan retirement. If it hurts me then we are going to take it from you because honestly, I dont care about you.""Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lason View PostOK you had me till this point. How can you possibly pass the entire blame on them? Can you not vote and email you legislaters to make change in the the system like you expect the old people to do years ago? How is the blame completely on them? Because they cant work anymore like use younger generation can? Thats some seriously cold hearted shit there.
This is that far right wing mentality that people from the far left use time and time to scare everyone.....
"Who cares what plans you made your whole life to plan retirement. If it hurts me then we are going to take it from you because honestly, I dont care about you."
I can email and write people in Washington, sure. Do I? Hell no. I'm not stupid enough to believe I will ever get a dime from Social Security, I wrote that shit off as a loss a long time ago. I have said it a hundred times, I would gladly withdraw from the program today and they can keep whatever I have paid in, that would be a fantastic deal for me.
Should the people who depend on social security today have been writing their congressman forty years ago? It sounds like they should have been.Originally posted by racrguyWhat's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?Originally posted by racrguyVoting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GhostTX View PostEven FDR didn't intend for SS to be the sole form of retirement income, just a supplement. Any body that ever relied on SS to be their only means of retirement income deserves to be put in government housing and eat the hockey puck meat substitutes.
I just can't get over the fact that I am the guy who is the farthest away from this problem yet I am the one who is supposed to feel guilty and then gladly pay for it all.Originally posted by racrguyWhat's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?Originally posted by racrguyVoting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GhostTX View PostEven FDR didn't intend for SS to be the sole form of retirement income, just a supplement. Any body that ever relied on SS to be their only means of retirement income deserves to be put in government housing and eat the hockey puck meat substitutes.
Originally posted by Broncojohnny View PostYou are correct, when it comes to politics and "social" causes where the government takes money from me forcefully, I don't care. I don't give a god damn about anyone but myself and my family. Why do people view the government stealing money by force to be on the same level as charity? If I want to be charitable, that should be my choice. There is nothing noble about taking money from someone in a supposedly free society, no matter the cause.
Thats where I have my problem, telling people something their whole lives only to change it after they have no control of the situation.
Originally posted by Broncojohnny View PostI can email and write people in Washington, sure. Do I? Hell no. I'm not stupid enough to believe I will ever get a dime from Social Security, I wrote that shit off as a loss a long time ago. I have said it a hundred times, I would gladly withdraw from the program today and they can keep whatever I have paid in, that would be a fantastic deal for me.
Should the people who depend on social security today have been writing their congressman forty years ago? It sounds like they should have been.
Al, even you see this as a contradiction. You wont write in and try to get it changed but they should have?? You said yourself it doesnt work so how could they have done it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Broncojohnny View PostThis is not really how I think. Do they deserve to be in that situation? No. Is it my problem they failed to plan? No.
I just can't get over the fact that I am the guy who is the farthest away from this problem yet I am the one who is supposed to feel guilty and then gladly pay for it all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Denny View PostWhat sucks is that if they stop paying out SS, they'd still demand it deducted from payrolls... "just in case they ever bring it back." LOL
Sent from my DROIDX using TapatalkOriginally posted by MR EDDU defend him who use's racial slurs like hes drinking water.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lason View PostI agree with you there. I dont believe in being forced to do anything. But these people paid in and were told they would be seeing this money when they retired. Would it be ok if you employer came out and pulled the rug out from under you right after you started collecting any kind of pension?
Thats where I have my problem, telling people something their whole lives only to change it after they have no control of the situation.
Originally posted by Lason View PostAl, even you see this as a contradiction. You wont write in and try to get it changed but they should have?? You said yourself it doesnt work so how could they have done it?Originally posted by racrguyWhat's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?Originally posted by racrguyVoting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Denny View PostWhat sucks is that if they stop paying out SS, they'd still demand it deducted from payrolls... "just in case they ever bring it back." LOLOriginally posted by racrguyWhat's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?Originally posted by racrguyVoting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Broncojohnny View PostI'm not stupid enough to believe I will ever get a dime from Social Security, I wrote that shit off as a loss a long time ago. I have said it a hundred times, I would gladly withdraw from the program today and they can keep whatever I have paid in, that would be a fantastic deal for me.
I wish a opt out of SS was possible if I could redirect the money pulled my check for SS into my own personal retirement plan I'd be set by the time I retire.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chevyhater01 View PostI wish a opt out of SS was possible if I could redirect the money pulled my check for SS into my own personal retirement plan I'd be set by the time I retire.Originally posted by racrguyWhat's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?Originally posted by racrguyVoting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Comment
Comment