Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Texas Legislature seeks to outlaw enhanced pat-downs by the TSA.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Texas Legislature seeks to outlaw enhanced pat-downs by the TSA.

    I approve of this message. I can assure you that placing my balls in your hand does not make anyone else safer. Especially you, Mr. $8 an hour power hungry high school drop out with a badge and fully justified inferiority complex.


    SAN ANTONIO (Reuters) – Texas Gov. Rick Perry on Monday added to state lawmakers' special session agenda a measure that would criminalize "enhanced pat-downs" by Transportation Security Administration agents at airports in the Lone Star State.
    The bill died during the regular session of the Texas Legislature, which ended May 30, and the Republican governor -- who is thinking of running for president -- has been under pressure from conservatives and Tea party groups to ask lawmakers to reconsider the measure. During special sessions, the Legislature may only consider items that the governor puts on the agenda.
    "I am grateful that the governor heard the calls of the people demanding that lawmakers stand up for the liberties of Texans," Wesley Strackbein, a conservative activist and founder of TSATyranny.com, told Reuters. Strackbein said he traveled to the Republican Leadership Conference in New Orleans over the weekend to confront Perry on the issue.
    The bill would make it a Class A misdemeanor -- punishable by up to a year in prison or a $4,000 fine -- for a TSA agent to "touch the anus, sexual organ, buttocks, or breast of another person, even through that person's clothing" for the purpose of "granting access to a building or a form of transportation."
    TSA pat-downs have drawn some high-profile criticism, including from former Miss USA Susie Castillo, who said in a widely-viewed online video. that she felt "molested" by a pat-down at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport in April.
    The proposed law passed the Texas House during the regular session but was pulled off the Senate floor without a vote after U.S. Attorney John Murphy circulated a letter to senators warning that TSA has the authority to prevent airplanes from taking off from Texas airports if the agency cannot certify that they are safe.
    In a blog on its website, TSA pointed out that the supremacy clause of the U.S. constitution prohibits states from regulating the federal government.
    "We, transportation security officers in particular, are trying to work in partnership with the traveling public to make you safe on flights," the blog says. "Work with us to provide the best possible security. That's all we ask."

  • #2
    Uncle Barry has threatened to cut off all air travel in Texas if it's passed. He can kiss our ass. Hell, I grew up on Greyhound buses anyway.

    Comment


    • #3
      Go Texas. It's about time to check the power of the Fed.
      I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

      Comment


      • #4
        Miss USA Susie Castillo, who said in a widely-viewed online video
        Time to google.
        Oh yea, fuck those pat-downs.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
          Uncle Barry has threatened to cut off all air travel in Texas if it's passed. He can kiss our ass. Hell, I grew up on Greyhound buses anyway.


          He won't do shit. Shut down the 3rd largest airport in the world in terms of aircraft movement? He doesn't possess the testicular fortitude.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by talisman View Post
            He won't do shit. Shut down the 3rd largest airport in the world in terms of aircraft movement? He doesn't possess the testicular fortitude.
            Of course it's an empty threat. I just find it funny he's stupid enough to even suggest it. Dumb bastard.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by talisman View Post
              "We, transportation security officers in particular, are trying to work in partnership with the traveling public to make you safe on flights," the blog says. "Work with us to provide the best possible security. That's all we ask."
              "We know what is good for you, how dare you say otherwise..."

              If the people of Texas are sick of the TSA's shit then they should be booted the fuck out of the state. This pat down horseshit has gone on long enough. I hope we have a shutdown and a face off with the federal government over this.
              Originally posted by racrguy
              What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
              Originally posted by racrguy
              Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Broncojohnny View Post
                "We know what is good for you, how dare you say otherwise..."

                If the people of Texas are sick of the TSA's shit then they should be booted the fuck out of the state. This pat down horseshit has gone on long enough. I hope we have a shutdown and a face off with the federal government over this.

                That would be awesome. This country really has turned into a fucking nanny state since 9/11. The worst part is, that 99.9% of this shit does absolutely nothing for safety.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Hell , you'd think they find 6-year-old girls with C4 in their panties on a regular basis. To date, not ONCE (to my knowledge) have they found an explosive device hidden on an American boarding a domestic flight.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    if someone really wants to get a bomb on a plane they will do it pat down or not.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Nanny state. The pat downs are pointless.

                      On the other hand, you don't have to fly, so no point in bitching about it. If people were really upset, they would take alternate means of travel and put a dent in the airlines' pocket book. This will not happen. People would rather take the convenience of flying and bitch and moan.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        if this tsa bs worked, I wouldn't know people who fly with weed on them. /smh

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
                          Uncle Barry has threatened to cut off all air travel in Texas if it's passed. He can kiss our ass. Hell, I grew up on Greyhound buses anyway.
                          After the jackoff said that, I'd do it just to spite him.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I'm fully behind the St of Texas telling the feds to get fucked! I'm not a proponent of high visibility security which is staffed by barely competent morons anyways. Making yourself a publicly hard target only encourages terrorists and people up to no good to innovate new ways to get around the system in place which is half assed at best. It's one thing to have overtly tough security presence and another to appear so. Both are going to force the people you're against to come up with new solutions to circumvent your security, but with half assed security behind your actual plan you're just not seeing the return you should for the increased risk you put yourself at. .02

                            Also random question...but if they do temporarily shut down air traffic in the state. Is that just Out of state and international traffic or would inner state traffic and more importantly commercial traffic going to be affected? The money FedEx and UPS would lose could easily make someone fold early I would think.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Dave View Post
                              Nanny state. The pat downs are pointless.

                              On the other hand, you don't have to fly, so no point in bitching about it. If people were really upset, they would take alternate means of travel and put a dent in the airlines' pocket book. This will not happen. People would rather take the convenience of flying and bitch and moan.

                              If you mean spend 3 days in a car driving across country as oppossed to 5 hours on a flight, then I guess count me in the bitching and moaning sector. People don't just travel for fun. Freedom of uninterrupted interstate travel is a cornerstone of a free society. This is like saying people should give up their cars if they don't like gas prices. This isn't 1850; there are some things that are necessary for a normal person to operate within modern societal norms. Your argument is lazy and weak at best.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X