Originally posted by racrguy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What makes the bible true
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Vertnut View PostYou're not pointing out I'm wrong. You have selective reading comprehension. You're arguing semantics. I said there is "evolution", but not ONLY evolution. There's way too many authors with idea's about why evolution can't explain a lot of the animal life we have. The human eye, the cardio system of the giraffe (Darwin's explanation is laughable, admitted by several scientists'), and a lot of other "oddities" in nature, cannot be explained by evolution. So they come up with the "genetic defect" crap. So anything that science doesn't cover, is a "genetic defect" or "mutation". Hell, you can use that silly excuse for anything, but for a supposed "science"? This thread was a pretty limp attempt to appear casual about this debate. It's a matter of faith either way. I have faith that a creator started this ball rolling, and you have faith that we crawled out of a genetic slime bucket. I love the "used to be a christian" dookie, too. It's a nice touch and really sets the tone.
Anything that science doesn't cover it says "I don't know" And immediately the religious people chime in with the "Well science doesn't know, so god done it."
How many times do I have to tell people, I place no faith in anything. I don't place faith that IOriginally posted by Vertnutcrawled out of a genetic slime bucket
Comment
-
Originally posted by racrguy View PostIf your understanding of scientific terminology, as evidenced by the quoted post, is any indication of your intelligence, you're severely lacking. You seem to think a theory is an idea (actual: hypothesis) when in fact theories have been tested and proven.
see #2 as quoted from dictionary.com:
the·o·ry
/ˈθiəri, ˈθɪəri/ Show Spelled[thee-uh-ree, theer-ee] Show IPA
–noun, plural -ries.
1.
a coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena: Einstein's theory of relativity.
2.
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
3.
Mathematics . a body of principles, theorems, or the like, belonging to one subject: number theory.
Originally posted by racrguy View PostHard to argue when you don't have a leg to stand on, isn't it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pro88LX View PostI know i said i was done, but i think you need to get your fats straight before telling other people they dont know shit.
see #2 as quoted from dictionary.com:
the·o·ry
/ˈθiəri, ˈθɪəri/ Show Spelled[thee-uh-ree, theer-ee] Show IPA
–noun, plural -ries.
1.
a coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena: Einstein's theory of relativity.
2.
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
3.
Mathematics . a body of principles, theorems, or the like, belonging to one subject: number theory.
you got me good.....
Originally posted by Anne Marie Helmenstine, Ph.D.Theory
A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A theory is valid as long as there is no evidence to dispute it. Therefore, theories can be disproven. Basically, if evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, then the hypothesis can become accepted as a good explanation of a phenomenon. One definition of a theory is to say it's an accepted hypothesis.
Example: It is known that on June 30, 1908 in Tunguska, Siberia, there was an explosion equivalent to the detonation of about 15 million tons of TNT. Many hypotheses have been proposed for what caused the explosion. It is theorized that the explosion was caused by a natural extraterrestrial phenomenon, and was not caused by man. Is this theory a fact? No. The event is a recorded fact. Is this this theory generally accepted to be true, based on evidence to-date? Yes. Can this theory be shown to be false and be discarded? Yes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by racrguy View PostYou said there were holes in evolution. Evolution doesn't touch on how the processes work, only how they change. You should read up on the theory of evolution so you don't get misconstrued as to what exactly evolution is about. In your statements against science or evolution, you need to be more specific so the points of contention can be addressed.
Anything that science doesn't cover it says "I don't know" And immediately the religious people chime in with the "Well science doesn't know, so god done it."
How many times do I have to tell people, I place no faith in anything. I don't place faith that I because life is here, provable, observable, measurable. Unlike your creator. Who, in his current definition cannot be proven, observed, or measured. Everything that exists can have those three things done to it. Since your creator cannot be proven, measured, or observed, he must not exist.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jdgregory84 View PostYou just have to accept the fact that not everybody is going to see eye to eye on religion just like other beliefs and leave it alone. If you think you're going to "open somebody's eyes" you're wrong.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vertnut View PostI can tell you're over your head when you become patronizing. You've answered none of the questions I posed, which is safe!
I've answered all your questions to the best of my ability. When you've asked questions and not made rhetorical statements, that is. Unless I've missed a question, I've handled all of them. If I haven't responded to a question, feel free to ask again and I will respond to the best of my ability
Comment
-
Originally posted by racrguy View PostIt's funny you say that. I posted this thread with a question, which STILL hasn't been answered.
I've answered all your questions to the best of my ability. When you've asked questions and not made rhetorical statements, that is. Unless I've missed a question, I've handled all of them. If I haven't responded to a question, feel free to ask again and I will respond to the best of my ability
And don't take my apology as me agreeing with you either lol.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pro88LX View PostI was going to PM you, but i think this is more appropriate here. I'm sorry iv'e been an ass to you. Been a rough few days. Anyways if you're ever in town, id like to buy you a beer. Ask Yale, i'm a pretty easy going dude. I still think i'm smarter though ..... (even though math is more of my strong suit than science lol)
And don't take my apology as me agreeing with you either lol.
I don't know when we'll be back in town. But rest assured, there will be a party when we do.
I don't think I've come across as a dick any, but if I did I apologize. It hasn't been a rough few days, but a lot of time to myself usually makes me a bit dickish, lol.
Comment
-
Originally posted by racrguy View PostNo hard feelings. He told me you were pretty cool. I wouldn't take your apology any other way. Hell, some of my friends are theists, and we get along great. My offer still stands to everyone else in this thread about the beer/burger&soda (except The King, that guy is a fucking moron.)
I don't know when we'll be back in town. But rest assured, there will be a party when we do.
I don't think I've come across as a dick any, but if I did I apologize. It hasn't been a rough few days, but a lot of time to myself usually makes me a bit dickish, lol.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BlackSnake View PostI believe there was pretty good evidence in post #15...
Comment
Comment