2010 Playoffs

[LS1Goat]

NFL.com did a special on the Top 100 players in NFL history. Manning was ahead of Brady. If Manning plays as long as Brett Favre did, then Manning could very well have most of the QB records in the NFL

I think Dan Marino was one of best QB's in the NFL. He has no rings. And his most TDs in a season is now owned by Brady who took it away from Manning. And Belichick/Brady have almost or already did break the most wins by a Coach/QB tandem. Brady also has most pass attempts without INT. And he has so many damn QB records I can't keep track.

Oh, and one more small tid bit. Over the same 10 year period, Manning has 1 SuperBowl ring and Brady has 3.

Tell more about how Peyton is better than Brady? I find this entertaining. Now, I'm not saying Peyton is not a great QB. He is, without a doubt one of the best. However, he's no Tom Brady. I was watching NFL GameDay Final and the guys were talking about Brady being the best of all time. Even over a Joe Montana. However, that's a tough argument as there has been a lot of incredible QBs, starting with Johnny Unitas. One of best IMO is Dan Marino, who has no SuperBowl rings. Went to the Super Bowl is sophmore season. Set tons of individual stats. Couldn't ever win the big game because the Dolphins never had a running game of any kind and an average defense.

Now to be fair. One thing that Manning, Brady, etc.. will never do. And that is eclipse Brett Favre's Iron Man record. Favre is/was a fucking gladiator with an incredible passion for the game. Not sure we'll ever see that happen again in our lifetimes.

[idrivea4banger]

I think Dan Marino was one of best QB's in the NFL. He has no rings. And his most TDs in a season is now owned by Brady who took it away from Manning. And Belichick/Brady have almost or already did break the most wins by a Coach/QB tandem. Brady also has most pass attempts without INT. And he has so many damn QB records I can't keep track.

Oh, and one more small tid bit. Over the same 10 year period, Manning has 1 SuperBowl ring and Brady has 3.

Tell more about how Peyton is better than Brady? I find this entertaining. Now, I'm not saying Peyton is not a great QB. He is, without a doubt one of the best. However, he's no Tom Brady. I was watching NFL GameDay Final and the guys were talking about Brady being the best of all time. Even over a Joe Montana. However, that's a tough argument as there has been a lot of incredible QBs, starting with Johnny Unitas. One of best IMO is Dan Marino, who has no SuperBowl rings. Went to the Super Bowl is sophmore season. Set tons of individual stats. Couldn't ever win the big game because the Dolphins never had a running game of any kind and an average defense.

Now to be fair. One thing that Manning, Brady, etc.. will never do. And that is eclipse Brett Favre's Iron Man record. Favre is/was a fucking gladiator with an incredible passion for the game. Not sure we'll ever see that happen again in our lifetimes.

Motherfucking x 1,000,000,000!!!

There will never be a QB like Bret Farve that will play as long as he did. I would like to think maybe Brady could, as long as they keep caliber players around him, but no one can beat his longest starting streak.

[pHILSANITY07]

i think montana is the geatest clutch QB of all time.

[Geor!]

Im in bed right now and will comment on your idiotic statements that we have all come to expect from you tomorrow when it is easier for me to type/edit on a real computer, mustangdouche_2000.

[Nash B.]

tom brady looks like a fag so i dont want to hear about that crap. Fuck Brady. He isnt even the best QB this decade. Manning is better than Brady.

You're high. Brady is by far the better quarterback.

^lulz

bitter much? a lot of hate there for the #1 seed in football. and i hate to be the bearer of bad news, but the winning 3 super bowls within 4 years usually qualifies you as a dynasty in football terms. just as the cowboys were labeled as such in the 90s when they did the same thing. and the 49ers dominance in the 80s. and the steelers dominance in the 70s.

not to mention how many team records and individual records brady and company have under belichicks tenure.

seriously, step away from the crack pipe. you're also skipping the part how brady sat out an entire season with a knee injury.

brady is almost an automatic league mvp. the road to the superbowl will go through foxboro. is that what makes you angry or is it because they are doing this with the youngest and least experienced defense in the nfl? ...lol

p.s. - what makes the patriots an elite team and labeled a "dynasty" by some, is because they have remained a playoff caliber team for nearly 10 years under nfl parity and salary cap. that's almost unheard of in modern nfl. it's nearly impossible to retain coaching staff and the nucleus of any successful football team season after season. and that is because of the strategy and genius of kraft/belichick. scouting is the key to success as the years go by. and the pats have that down to a science.

They're not a dynasty. They were a dynasty between 2001 and 2006, and they've been a very solid team for the last decade, but they don't have the dominance they did 5 years ago.

NFL.com did a special on the Top 100 players in NFL history. Manning was ahead of Brady. If Manning plays as long as Brett Favre did, then Manning could very well have most of the QB records in the NFL

Yeah, I'm not buying it. Manning is struggling with a bunch of nobodies around him; Brady is thriving.

[78X]

fuck new england

Fuck em all u want they be good

[mstng86]

As long as the Eagles don't win, it is all good.

There must be a typo, wherez the Cowboys?

[papapepper]

New Orleans over Seattle
Indianapolis over New York
Baltimore over Kansas City
Green Bay over Philadelphia

[mstng86]

Sun., Jan. 9 at 4:30 p.m. ET: No. 6 PACKERS at No. 3 EAGLES
Sat., Jan. 8 at 4:30 p.m. ET: No. 5 SAINTS at No. 4 SEAHAWKS

Sat., Jan. 8 at 8 p.m. ET: No. 6 JETS at No. 3 COLTS
Sun., Jan. 9 at 1 p.m. ET: No. 5 RAVENS at No. 4 CHIEFS

LMAO, thats alot of road wins for the playoffs. But is what I think is going to happen.

[Geor!]

^lulz

bitter much? a lot of hate there for the #1 seed in football. and i hate to be the bearer of bad news, but the winning 3 super bowls within 4 years usually qualifies you as a dynasty in football terms.

I never argued otherwise! They are no longer a dynasty though, after 7 years without a super bowl. There's your first stupid statement.

just as the cowboys were labeled as such in the 90s when they did the same thing. and the 49ers dominance in the 80s. and the steelers dominance in the 70s.

Exactly, but there is a limit (hint: see above)!

There's two!

seriously, step away from the crack pipe. you're also skipping the part how brady sat out an entire season with a knee injury.

Oh, so one season away effects the team for seven seasons? That's nice to know. I've got my excuse lined up if one of our key players is out for an entire season in the future!

Three!

the road to the superbowl will go through foxboro.

They are the number one seed, after all. Not sure if you were being your usual idiotic self, or what with this comment, as nobody really needed to know that, as they already did!

p.s. - what makes the patriots an elite team and labeled a "dynasty" by some, is because they have remained a playoff caliber team for nearly 10 years under nfl parity and salary cap. that's almost unheard of in modern nfl. it's nearly impossible to retain coaching staff and the nucleus of any successful football team season after season. and that is because of the strategy and genius of kraft/belichick. scouting is the key to success as the years go by. and the pats have that down to a science.

The Steelers have been a playoff caliber team since the Cowher era, and would have been through the Chuck Noll era, if it weren't for the mid 80s dry spell. Does that mean they're still a dynasty as well?

How about this? You stick to talking about things you know well, like scrapbooking and taking it up the ass, and let the real men talk sports.

[momo]

seattle wins sb.

[Geor!]

Mustangman, thank you! I guess you're A-ok with me. Typical Steelers fan response from Geor. The Patriots are a Dynasty because of their impeccable success with top notch players and continue to do so.

See my response to him.

[Sean88gt]

seattle wins sb.

That would be awesome.

[mstng86]

I wouldn't consider the Patriots a dynasty at this time either. That went away when they lost to the Giants in the Super Bowl, which the Steelers never did in the 70's, or the 49ers in the 80's or the Cowboys in the 90's.

As far as them having top notch players, I don't necessarily agree with that either. They obviously have a top notch system in making average players look really good. I don't know what they do, but they do it well and make their players look good.

[LS1Goat]

How about this? You stick to talking about things you know well, like scrapbooking and taking it up the ass, and let the real men talk sports.

You need to get laid or rub one out. We are all just armchair sports analyst and pundits in here. However, you seem to be taking it all in on a deeper level for some odd reason.

I'll just take solace in the fact that you are in a very small minority regarding your negative opinions about the Patriots or Tom Brady.