Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MLB moves to eliminate third-to-first pickoff trickery, but no one has any idea why

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MLB moves to eliminate third-to-first pickoff trickery, but no one has any idea why

    Those ballpark loudmouths who don't know what they're talking about when they see a pitcher fake a pickoff throw to third base and then yell "BALK!" when the pitcher turns and throws to first base instead?

    Yeah, there's a good chance they will soon actually know what they're talking about.

    Ben Walker of the Associated Press reports that Major League Baseball is looking into classifying that old Pony League trick as a balk for the 2013 season. So if a right-hander wants to pick off a guy at first, he'll have to do it with straight-up skills and not deception that rarely works anyway. As Walker notes, this pickoff play could be picked off itself.

    From the Associated Press:

    The Playing Rules Committee has approved a proposal to make it a balk, too, with MLB executives and umpires in agreement. The players' union vetoed the plan for this season to discuss it further. MLB is allowed to implement the change after a one-year wait — no telling whether that would happen if players strongly object.

    Under the new wording, a pitcher could not fake to third unless he first stepped off the rubber. If he stayed on the rubber ... it would be a balk.

    Of course, it's worth asking the question why the rules committee is spending time on this and not others like instant replay. Was this move really such a big problem that it needed extra attention? Do they think taking away part of the pitcher's control of the running game — and it's debatable just how much control this move really creates — will produce more offense?

    [MLB Full Count: Watch LIVE look-ins and highlights for free all season long]

    I guess the best argument out there is that left-handed pitchers can't attempt the same move without being called for a balk. Yankees lefty Boone Logan makes this very claim in Walker's article. But equality and fairness simply don't exist in the pickoff game and I can't remember hearing many right-handers complain that left-handers get a special advantage by facing toward first when pitching out of the stretch — giving them a full view of the runner's lead until he starts his delivery.

    Also, if it's something that's designed to speed up the game, it seems like a token move, at best. After all, if Bruce Chen can still throw 1o regular pickoff attempts in one at-bat, what good does getting rid of an occasional gimmick pickoff attempt do? (Outside of giving us the pleasure of yelling "BALK!" with the previously misinformed, of course?)

    Seriously, with no previous controversy surrounding this age-old play, I wouldn't be surprised to find that the playing rules committee came around with this idea while wearing shirts that said "Here comes Selig! Look busy!"

  • #2
    I have always thought the move was kinda goofy, and I dont remember a time even seeing it get remotely close to working. I dont see a reason to completely get rid of it though?? If a pitcher wants to waste his time and risk a balk I say let him, hell Bard for the Red Sox balked twice in one atbat the other day doing this move.

    Comment


    • #3
      Replays are more important than wasting time with this one, IMHO.
      Karussell White - 2010 Genesis Coupe R-Spec 6MT 2.0T -

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by GTBrian23 View Post
        I have always thought the move was kinda goofy, and I dont remember a time even seeing it get remotely close to working. I dont see a reason to completely get rid of it though?? If a pitcher wants to waste his time and risk a balk I say let him, hell Bard for the Red Sox balked twice in one atbat the other day doing this move.
        The Angels have burned the Yankees with it repeatedly. It serves other purposes besides just trying to get a runner out. You can often get a hitter to show if he's going to bunt or not. It freezes the runner at first a fraction of a second longer too. That can be the difference in out or safe at second or possibly being able to turn a double play. It's a part of the game and shouldn't be changed. If they won't to get rid of something, then lose the DH.

        Comment


        • #5
          Stupid. Why dick with it? MLB doesn't need to go NFL and screw with the rules making the sport totally different.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by juiceweezl View Post
            The Angels have burned the Yankees with it repeatedly. It serves other purposes besides just trying to get a runner out. You can often get a hitter to show if he's going to bunt or not. It freezes the runner at first a fraction of a second longer too. That can be the difference in out or safe at second or possibly being able to turn a double play. It's a part of the game and shouldn't be changed. If they won't to get rid of something, then lose the DH.
            Im sure it does work, I just have never really seen it. I see no reason to change the rule. I am indifferent about the DH, I enjoy the addded excitement from having the extra weapon on offense I also respect the anti-dh arguement.

            Comment

            Working...
            X