T.O. passed his physical and possibly a titan

[pHILSANITY07]

I'd take Cam Newton or Red Dalton over him right now.

aint like Newton is doing way better than Dalton. Plus Newton has Steve Smith who isn't a rookie WR like AJ Green or 2nd year man Jordan Shipley

Dalton's numbers

62.4 completion percentage /1,311 yards passing / 7 passing TD's / 1 Rushing TD / 5 Intercetptions

Newton's numbers

58.5 completion percentage / 1,847 yards passing / 7 passing TD's / 6 Rushing TD's / 9 Interceptions.

[unkoricky]

aint like Newton is doing way better than Dalton. Plus Newton has Steve Smith who isn't a rookie WR like AJ Green or 2nd year man Jordan Shipley

Dalton's numbers

62.4 completion percentage /1,311 yards passing / 7 passing TD's / 1 Rushing TD / 5 Intercetptions

Newton's numbers

58.5 completion percentage / 1,847 yards passing / 7 passing TD's / 6 Rushing TD's / 9 Interceptions.

If you were going by stats, thats like saying Mark Sanchez is better than Sam Bradford, watch a game instead of the numbers.
I take it your saying Dalton is better than Cam now??
Shipley doesnt even play and look at Steve Smith before Cam...

anyways i dont care either way, mark sanchez sucks period.

[krazy kris]

I am a T.O fan as well... The Raiders would be a good fit for him... I just hate the Jets and don't want to have to defend him when they play my Ravens again...

raven fan high five

[Geor!]

raven fan high five

Coupla fags if you ask me. Suck my black and gold balls.

[SS Junk]

He old and he gonna get hurt again quickly

[krazy kris]

Coupla fags if you ask me. Suck my black and gold balls.

don't be jealous or hines ward will get decleated again, bitch

[unkoricky]

don't be jealous or hines ward will get decleated again, bitch

haha hines deserved that, but this is one of my favorites too though.

[pHILSANITY07]

whats funny is sanchez has more playoff wins than romo lol

[unkoricky]

whats funny is sanchez has more playoff wins than romo lol

trent dilfer, brad johnson and eli have won superbowls, funny what a great defense can do for you.

[pHILSANITY07]

trent dilfer, brad johnson and eli have won superbowls, funny what a great defense can do for you.

cowboys have a good defense lol

[paul_376]

He throws everyone under the bus and blames the QB, the coach, offensive cordinator. But no one blames TO about his crappy butterfinger hands, his route running or lack of route running. And his heart for the game.

women lie, men lie, numbers dont

[Geor!]

women lie, men lie, numbers dont

5-2 = 1

They just did.

[Nash B.]

5-2 = 1

They just did.

No, you lied. 5-2 does not equal 1.

[paul_376]

Touchdowns
Super Bowl Plays
Receiving Rushing
Year Age Tm Pos No. G GS Rec Yds Y/R TD Lng R/G Y/G Att Yds TD Lng Y/A Y/G A/G YScm RRTD Fmb AV
1996 23 SFO WR 81 16 10 35 520 14.9 4 46 2.2 32.5 520 4 1 6
1997 24 SFO WR 81 16 15 60 936 15.6 8 56 3.8 58.5 936 8 1 10
1998 25 SFO wr 81 16 10 67 1097 16.4 14 79 4.2 68.6 4 53 1 21 13.3 3.3 0.3 1150 15 1 12
1999 26 SFO WR 81 14 14 60 754 12.6 4 36 4.3 53.9 754 4 1 6
2000*+ 27 SFO WR 81 14 13 97 1451 15.0 13 69 6.9 103.6 3 11 0 5 3.7 0.8 0.2 1462 13 3 16
2001*+ 28 SFO WR 81 16 16 93 1412 15.2 16 60 5.8 88.3 4 21 0 12 5.3 1.3 0.3 1433 16 0 18
2002*+ 29 SFO WR 81 14 14 100 1300 13.0 13 76 7.1 92.9 7 79 1 38 11.3 5.6 0.5 1379 14 0 14
2003* 30 SFO WR 81 15 15 80 1102 13.8 9 75 5.3 73.5 3 -2 0 3 -0.7 -0.1 0.2 1100 9 0 12
2004*+ 31 PHI WR 81 14 14 77 1200 15.6 14 59 5.5 85.7 3 -5 0 6 -1.7 -0.4 0.2 1195 14 2 12
2005 32 PHI wr 81 7 7 47 763 16.2 6 91 6.7 109.0 1 2 0 2 2.0 0.3 0.1 765 6 0 6
2006 33 DAL WR 81 16 15 85 1180 13.9 13 56 5.3 73.8 1180 13 0 13
2007*+ 34 DAL WR 81 15 15 81 1355 16.7 15 52 5.4 90.3 1 5 0 5 5.0 0.3 0.1 1360 15 0 15
2008 35 DAL WR 81 16 16 69 1052 15.2 10 75 4.3 65.8 7 33 0 8 4.7 2.1 0.4 1085 10 1 9
2009 36 BUF WR 81 16 16 55 829 15.1 5 98 3.4 51.8 6 54 1 29 9.0 3.4 0.4 883 6 1 7
2010 37 CIN WR 81 14 11 72 983 13.7 9 78 5.1 70.2 983 9 0 8
Career 219 201 1078 15934 14.8 153 98 4.9 72.8 39 251 3 38 6.4 1.1 0.2 16185 156 11 164
8 yrs SFO 121 107 592 8572 14.5 81 79 4.9 70.8 21 162 2 38 7.7 1.3 0.2 8734 83 7 94
3 yrs DAL 47 46 235 3587 15.3 38 75 5.0 76.3 8 38 0 8 4.8 0.8 0.2 3625 38 1 37
2 yrs PHI 21 21 124 1963 15.8 20 91 5.9 93.5 4 -3 0 6 -0.8 -0.1 0.2 1960 20 2 18
1 yr BUF 16 16 55 829 15.1 5 98 3.4 51.8 6 54 1 29 9.0 3.4 0.4 883 6 1 7
1 yr CIN 14 11 72 983 13.7 9 78 5.1 70.2 983 9 0 8

[Geor!]

No, you lied. 5-2 does not equal 1.

Yes, you are starting to be like papaporker.